I usually have trouble with qualitative analysis of fruit beers. For example, consider an extremely overstated raspberry beer. One that both smells and tastes like fresh raspberry and nothing else. I like raspberries, so I may enjoy drinking it. But is it well-made? Not really. I can buy some raspberry juice or wine and accomplish the same effect. So while it may be a decent beverage, it is not an impressive beer. Balance is typically the hallmark of a world class brew, and these "fruit-bombs" are anything but balanced. But then the issue becomes the definition of "balanced." I think I've established that the base beer should at least be detectable, but at what proportion of base beer to fruit is the beer balanced? The usual axiom for spiced beers is that if the drinker can identify the spice, then it's too much (the cardamom in Stone Vertical Epic 07.07.07 comes to mind). Fruit beers, though, seem to have a different standard; they require more fruit presence. After all, eating plain blueberries is commonplace, but I don't know anyone that will eat a spoonful of straight coriander (dares aside).
![]() |
| Hanssens Oudbeitje, a nice fruit lambic made with Strawberries. |
After all of this, I still haven't answered my initial question. The fruit in a fruit beer should be identifiable, but not overwhelming. There's still a lot of room for play between the extremes. I'll call this the zone of "open to interpretation." As for my cherry dunkelweizen, I think I'll choose the conservative route with the fruit. Present, but toward the background. We'll see how it goes.
Oh, and for the curious, here is the base recipe for the dunkeweizen:
68% wheat malt
25% dark Munich malt
3.5% chocolate wheat
3.5% Special B
~10 IBU worth of Mt. Hood hops for bittering only. Weihenstephaner yeast. Cherry (amount TBD) in secondary.
Cheers,
--Joe

No comments:
Post a Comment