![]() |
| A headier-than-intended pour of my "amber ale" |
So where does it fit, then? Try to be open minded here. The judges have no idea what I intended to brew. All they have is a sample of the beer and the style I entered it as. With that in mind, let's look at another style. With all that Munich malt, how about either Vienna or Oktoberfest (3A or 3B)? Both of these styles are lagers, and the brew in question is an ale, but the judges don't have to know that. If it has lager characteristics, the judges will never know that there is residual melibiose in the beer (trivia tidbit: that is the true difference between lager and ale yeast. Melibiose is a disaccharide sugar that lager yeast can ferment and ale yeast cannot). The flavor description of Vienna very closely describes my brew, and Oktoberfest isn't too far off, so maybe I'm onto something. But the aroma could be an issue. Oktoberfest requires "no hop aroma." Right now, the Centennial hops are still noticeable. However, the essential oils that provide hop aroma are unstable and decay with time (actually fairly quickly). So if I let this age, the hop aroma would dissipate and it might fit into the Oktoberfest style. But this beer isn't designed to age, and aging would probably develop other problems that would make it not fare well in competition regardless of category. So I'll nix that option. But, it's a moot point anyway, since both Oktoberfest and Vienna state that "caramel aroma is inappropriate." While the Munich aroma dominates, that caramel is there and unavoidable. Time to look at more styles.
At this point in becomes tempting to go to category 23-- Specialty Beer. This is simply a catchall category the BJCP added for crazy exploratory brews. Its only style descriptor is that the beer can't fit into another style. I would always hesitate to enter a Specialty Beer, preferring to enter as a classic style if possible. This is especially true of my amber ale, since while I'm having trouble categorizing it, it really is not an unusual-seeming beer, and would be lost among all the wildly experimental stuff that gets submitted in that category. So I'll look on.
Flipping through the categories, English Brown Ale (11) seems plausible. It's divided into three styles: Mild (11A), Southern English Brown (11B), and Northern English Brown (11C). My beer obviously doesn't fit Mild, so I'll skip that. Southern English Brown emphasizes fruitiness, so that one won't fly. Then comes Northern English Brown. While in my mind I had no intention of this being a brown ale, all of the style descriptors seem to fit. The guidelines describe "gentle to moderate malt sweetness, with a nutty, lightly caramelly character and a medium-dry to dry finish. Malt may also have a toasted, biscuity, or toffee-like character." The Munich character of my brew could easily pass as a combination of nutty and toasted malts. The description also allows for a certain amount of hops, which is good. And what's this? The appearance should be "dark amber to reddish-brown." I suppose my dark amber beer fits quite nicely, then. The only place I can see the guidelines distinctly differing is in carbonation level, preferring less than is in my beer. But that's minor enough to not be a terrible loss of points. So, while I'll continue to call this an amber ale when discussing it, if I enter it in a competition, it will go as a Northern English Brown.
While being bound by style categories may seem restrictive, especially for the adventurous brewer, it is unavoidable when entering competitions. It is important to take care to enter in the appropriate category, and the appropriate category may not be immediately obvious. So be open minded. And if you can't settle on a style, just keep the beer to yourself where you know it will be appreciated.
Cheers,
--joe

No comments:
Post a Comment